Let’s Reclaim Our Civilization

There is clear evidence emerging that the Indian civilization has existed in a continuum since atleast 7000BC (9000 years earlier) — which is the date assigned to Mehrgarh, probably the world’s first city. Mehrgarh, now in Pakistan, is part of the early phase of the Indus Valley Civilization — which now is being referred to as the Harappa Civilization, or more accurately as the Indus-Saraswati Civilization.

Lately, i have been reading articles in mainstream media about the need for Pakistan to look East towards the “Indus Man”, for finding the roots of its civilization rather than continuing to look towards the West at the Arab world.

There are even blogs coming out as well on the topic, which are claiming the Indus Civilization as their own, and ironically in the same breath conveniently ignore truth of being part of a a greater Indian civilization, out of which they emerged. It is ofcourse inconvenient, and perhaps too radical. Accepting the Indus man from 7000 years ago is easier than accepting being “Indian” just until 65 years ago.

The problems in Kashmir

It is my belief that the problems in Kashmir are originating out the same “look-west” and “Islamic nationalism” approach, rather than finding our roots in the cultural civilization from where we all came. Islam is *not outside of this civilization*, rather a significant part of this. The 2nd oldest mosque in the world existed in India in Kerala. Hindus had a major role in creating prosperity and wealth (through trade) in Yemen and all major middle-eastern ports for over 2000 years.

There is now clear genomic evidence that from Kashmir to Kanyakumari and Gujarat to Manipur, we are a common people with a common genetic code. Instead of the Aryans invading India, it was probably the Indians who moved out around 10,000 years ago to what is now Iran and even Central Asia.Proving this is not the point of this blog. Getting to “talk” is!Let’s reclaim “our” civilizationNow that the Pakistanis seem to be waking upto their roots in the Indus-Sarawati Civilization, Kashmir probably will follow suit. And it is time that the “neo-secular” political establishment — which brands anyone who speaks of civilizational roots, is branded a Saffronised Communal element — change its outlook. Surprisingly, it would be as difficult as probably it is in Pakistan to effect this change in these nationalists who seem to believe in a nation that was born less than 65 years ago.

And this is where i wish to take some action.

SparkCamps

Let’s start this change with the liberal, and more open to accepting new ideas generation — the Twitter and the Facebook generation. They’ve caused revolutions in many countries of the Middle East, and the ones where they were completely suppressed – the governments (or rather monarchies) are beginning to slowly change. They “know” change is coming, and they’d better keep pace — or their statues will fall as well.

True to the spirit of the Indian sub-continent — a spirit of dialogue, debates, and arguments — that have existed in our saints and religions, let’s get to business again. Let’s talk! Debate! Argue!

And let’s do it tech and business style — modelled on the the globally popular Bar Camps.

Unfortunately, the wonderful name i came up with is taken by an innovation and creative camp, designed on the lines of Bar Camp. So we will need another appealing name. Something to which the verbose Twitter and Facebook generation will connect to.

Secularism has come to mean rejection of religion and civilization — atleast in India. And France has gone too far with it. Instead of Secularism, we need to develop healthy tolerance for our religions, cultures, and world-views.

Let’s understand about our religions, its nuances, discuss the problems, share solutions; let’s talk about the new age coming, imagine a new world of the future — and in the process help manifest it.

I need help to get started

Anyone?

Using “seedballs” to create forests — a knowledge repository

Research has shown that 50% to 70% “seedballs” survive and grow. This is much higher than the rate of survival of saplings, which is pegged at less than 20% (citation needed).

Further, it can cost upto Rs.500 or more per sapling to create saplings in a nursery and care for them — cost of the nursery, human labour in nurturing them, planting saplings and finally taking care of the saplings over 1-2 years.

Seedballs were originally developed by Masanobu Fukuoka, among the world’s leading natural farming experts who revolutionized Japan’s rice cultivation. He is best known for his book titled “One Straw Revolution“.

Success Stories

Success stories from project implementations globally are nicely collated and documented at: https://sites.google.com/site/onseedballs/projects-results

Making Seedballs

One of the best knowledge sources i have come across on the process of making seedballs on a small and large scale is by Jim Bones, a student of Sensei Masanobu Fukuoka. This under 30 minute video describes the process of making seedballs by hand on a small scale, and using the “Von Bachmayr drum” invented by Alfred von Bachmayr of Santa Fe, New Mexico for large scale preparation of seedballs.

Collecting Seeds

<to be continued>

“New Principles for Corporate Design” – Corporations 2020

“What is the core purpose of the corporation? How should it be designed to seamlessly blend sustainability  into its design, ownership, governance, strategy and practices? Corporation 20/20 is an international, multi-stakeholder initiative that seeks to answer these questions. Its goal is to develop and disseminate a vision, pathway for the 21st century corporation in which social purpose moves from the periphery to the heart of the organization.  Such transformation is indispensable to a Great Transition toward a just and livable world.”
  1. The purpose of the corporation is to harness private interests to serve the public interest.
  2. Corporations shall accrue fair returns for shareholders, but not at the expense of the legitimate interests of other stakeholders.
  3. Corporations shall operate sustainably, meeting the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.
  4. Corporations shall distribute their wealth equitably among those who contribute to its creation.
  5. Corporations shall be governed in a manner that is participatory, transparent, ethical, and accountable.
  6. Corporations shall not infringe on the right of natural persons to govern themselves, nor infringe on other universal human rights.

—————

Source: http://www.corporation2020.org/

The business of a business is to do business

The business of a business is to do business

This is what i heard a Goldratt certified trainer in India state with a roaring voice during an industry event where he was invited to speak. He then later on went to literally reprimand every business-owner among the audience who spoke about “values”, and “helping to make a better world”, and such similar moral objectives of running their business. I was among the ones who got a good blowing. This was 5 years ago.

The roar of his voice shortly gave way to the call of my heart over the months, even as i “got” the idea behind the “Theory of Constraints” rather well. I was back to doing business for “good of others” with huge goals and aspirations from life, constantly trying to instil values of “high-thinking and simple living” among my people. Running my company like a “co-operative” or as a Section 25 company were ideas on which i had spent hundreds of man hours (no kidding!) researching, discussing, reading and evolving a model.

The state was such that in all these high aspirations i forgot that i had a goal of running the business well, and earning money for its growth, for the growth of employees, and for the sake of the area we worked in. “Remaining consciously small” was the mantra i again followed for years. Ofcourse, i must state that this mantra was adopted after 2-3 failed attempts to scale, through the way of building partnerships along the way.

Looking back now, “staying small by choice” was more out of the frustration of not having the abilities of a good CEO to enable scaling up the enterprise. However, it was not with such deep introspection that i decided to join an Owner-Manager Program with CIAM. It was just by chance it came along, and i liked the idea of a few entrepreneurs sitting together and talking about business challenges.

“Do you know most of you sitting in this room can get salaries way more than what you pay yourself? You are all at best “self-employed professionals” – “glorified freelancers”, who do not like to be held accountable and be reporting to a boss

The primary goal of an entrepreneur is to grow the enterprise. If you like doing “creative work”, go work in a creative agency; don’t run a business. If you like to do “social good” work for an NGO!”

This time, it was Rattan Chugh, the former CEO of Fidelity India, and currently a faculty at CIAM, who made this highly provocative statement. My world really came crashing down. I WAS DEEPLY DISTURBED. Once again “Small is Beautiful” by Schumacher and “Small Giants” by Bo Burlingham was ringing in my head. Further – “i am NOT an entrepreneur – what bullshit. Entrepreneurs are entrepreneurs even if they keep the business small”, is what i wanted to get up and shout back at him.And what about “values” of running a business? Huh? Well, i tried to argue back a bit with him, but Rattan was least interested in debating with me endlessly.

Out for lunch, i caught him again. And explained passionately how Nescafe should not be making “coffee sachets” (passionately shaking one such sachet in my hand), as they are brutal to the environment.”I never said have no values, or do not care about your employees, but your business purpose is to grow the enterprise and make it better”, he re-asserted what he was saying.

I was quiet. He was right! All the years of hiding behind “being small and sustainable” (as much as i could manage) was giving way to a “sense of failure” in achieving growth for the enterprise. Not only had i been horribly irresponsible with my own finances, i’ve costed the company as well with my inability to do what was needed to grow the enterprise.

If low cost staff augmentation was what was needed to be done, it was needed to be done. But no, i had my values about India growing up the value chain; and looked down upon companies who did this. Forget what i did to myself financially, by not going this route, i also frustrated the good employees by not being able to afford better salaries for them.

India would have been a better place, with a more successful Srijan – driven by values, and yet using market opportunities to create an even bigger success story for an open source company, and by doing wealth creation for myself, my people and my company.

Doing what is needed of a CEO is the need of the hour, no matter what the skills, or the lack of them, are. A business model needs to be created for finding more clients and serving them well. Induction more and better people needs to happen, if i find myself, and the current partnerships inadequate to grow the enterprise. The enterprise called Srijan must grow!

Find ways to do so. Find ways to pay yourself a market salary, Rahul!

We have something unique about us, and this must succeed.

Learning Societies Unconference; Mumbai; 28 Feb to 04 Mar 2012

I’m applying for attending the Learning Societies Unconfernce to be held near Mumbai between 28 Feb and 04 Mar 2012. The 3 questions they asked me, and my responses.

 

Please describe yourself and your own learning/unlearning journey in a short personal note (up to 500 words) which can be shared with the larger group. *

My internet social profiles say: “Entrepreneur/ Drupal, Open Source evangelist/ Green activist/ Pilgrim/ In pursuit of a purposeful life”.

I’ve been an entrepreneur for most of my working life. Have mastered the art of *delaying gratification* (even though it is beginning to hurt the financial planning for the family a bit), i’ve learnt to *live fairly frugally*. Actually, i’ve always had an intuitive pull towards frugal and sustainable living; about sharing and co-ownership; towards spiritual values. This pull led to a search for the divine fairly early on in my life, leading first to a crisis/depression, eventually resulting in a *search* for health, wellness, and a *deep seeking*. I still do not know what i am seeking; what i am after – so end up calling myself a *pilgrim, in pursuit of a purposeful life*.

Yet i know where to look – sustainable farming, renewable energy, meditation, Gandhi, writing of life, travelling, photography, advocacy, a bit of coaching, employee-owned companies, and entrepreneurship.

 

What kind of learning communities and learning experiments have you been trying co-create? *

“Beyond Tech” is an initiative i’ve seeded at Srijan to help bring diversity and breadth to people. http://www.srijan.in/beyond-tech. This year my goal is to startup two more projects:

a) invest in a large piece of land in the mountains alongwith Navin Pangti – with the objective of forming a base for experimentation with *BioChar* for increased organic agriculture productivity, for regenerating degraded forests around using “seedball sowing”, and eventually creating a sustainable local economy with an element of eco-tourism.

b) create an e-commerce property to bring give market access for natural and wellness products to self-help groups and social communities around the country

What questions, topics, workshops, proposals, projects, invitations, etc. related to unfolding learning societies would you like to contribute and further explore in this unconference? *

The two projects listed above. BioChar is of keen interest to me given its tremendous benefits in increasing agricultural produce naturally, and its tremendous potential in acting as a *carbon sink*. As an example, 1 ton of BioChar = 3 tonnes of CO2.

Niswey – a startup venture with Abhinav Sahai

This Friday i signed-up a partnership agreement with Abhinav Sahai. We’ve together setup Niswey Digital Marketing Services LLP, a registered partnership firm with Abhinav as the majority shareholder.

Abhinav had joined Srijan in Nov 2008 right after completing his B.Tech. from a college in the Delhi region. He joined as a TYPO3 developer (for those of us who know Srijan and it’s work with Drupal – back then Srijan was an all out TYPO3 company until we started making the move to Drupal slowly since about the same year). He had joined with references of colleagues with whom he had volunteered for an open source event called Freed.in.

I had this habit of picking up enthused and passionate characters even if they did not know much about technology (not to suggest that Abhinav did not). To date i value passion and drive – a fire-in-the-belly attitude – more than skills any given time. Ofcourse, skills are important, but you find many skilled people with a poor attitude or no depth of vision for the life they want; with no pursuits higher than “become a Team Lead in 5 years from now” or “earn a high salary” or “work for big brand after 2 years; i’m being honest sir”. I have nothing against people who pursue material or such positional gains, but i have a bias towards people who seem to be seeking something more. Some can articulate these well; most can’t – but their actions demonstrate their passions.

Abhinav’s actions – his participation in Freed.in, and participating in an open source drug design initiative at JNU, got him a reference, and eventually a job at Srijan.

However, this honeymoon lasted just about 1 month. He sent a “siging off” email before catching a train back to his home town in Lucknow, not giving me a chance to even speak with him.

hello sir

this is probably one of the toughest decision i have made. I am quitting srijan.You might be hurt by my decision and considering the fact that you are such a nice person, I didnt want to hurt you but i have to. It was only because of you that i stayed this long even.

Initially when i joined srijan i was very happy about it. I had come with a perception that i would be working with some great minds, the likes of Gora sir, Ipsita and then found Riteshji and syed bhai as well. I used to find qualities in everyone and was very happy about all of it. I even declined another offer in a large organization for it. I didn’t regrret it then but maybe a month from them had that offer come i would have accepted that.

In those 55 days at srijan i found more reasons to quit than to be a part of it and then when finally i thought i wasn’t willing to sit there for even 6 hours I decided to quit. I was never there for salary, money was not an issue for me. I had come thinking that i would be working for the open source world. a place that would not be comprising of office politics, where deserving people would be above you and a place where i would be able to learn at a pace and skills which would make stand out of the league. Maybe that’s a mistake i committed. Srijan’s site has in its header, “ethics should not stay at home when we go to work”, but frankly speaking how many in your company follow that? The question mark stands in front of you as well.
Are people deserving enough to get the designation they are holding? or the salary they are getting? Are you doing the right thing by shedding off your responsibilities? I believe if a person cannot manage 20 people and keep them happy then i guess he should not dream of heading an organization, or maybe then hire an HR for that job. I was not at all happy staying there straight 15 days into the place. Not enough good people to be with. If this is how IT companies are then maybe i won’t get back to this industry again. I will probably join some management job or maybe do an MBA (if required) and then do some managing job.

After this piece, he wrote a long list of rants against people who he saw were deceiving me, were inefficient and eating on the company time, money and resources; he also gave me a download on who should be promoted and how we should deliver projects.

Part of all this was instigated by our salary review process, which i was trying to make really transparent, and the responsibility of deciding salaries – their own and of others as well – back on the people. Someone had pointed out to me that this was an “abdication of  your responsibility” (was it Abhinav who said this?); that time i did not see it, but now i do (but honestly, i must acknowledge i still grow cold feet when salary review time hovers on my head).

Abhinav shifted his career from technology to Digital Marketing, quitting about 3 jobs during this period – he just could not settle anywhere, in any standard company environment – which he probably found even more dissatisfying for many reasons than Srijan.

I guess we both liked the honesty of character in each other, which was probably the reason all throughout we kept in touch over these years. None of us had burnt our bridges with each other.

A year back, i got interested in the work he was doing, and that he had had a start-up stint in Digital Marketing, which was now shutdown.

The most important thing to me in my life is to work with good people, and enable them leap-frong to achieve their dreams. In this process i believe i will find my life’s fulfillment, and financial security. I must admit, i find myself pretty incompetent as a manager; and many of my colleagues have told me i am not a natural leader. While i am harsh on myself, i do have some exceptional difficult-to-find qualities (am being a bit fair and easy on myself!), specifically with maintaining and building on relationships and with identifying great people to work with. Inspired people often find inspiration from me, and some even turn to me for advise. Not boasting; just trying to give a perspective here.

So, i kept nagging Abhinav every now and then, about what he wanted to do. I wanted someone like him to help me out with Srijan’s Digital Marketing initiative. I’d come across many agencies, and some good people – but none so far with such a deep drive and dedication and honesty in his work and pursuits.

So, i worked out a model for him to make the leap – i organised his financial security through two clients, one being Srijan, and the other being my partner’s private project. Abhinav joined us about 6 months back.

This Friday, 09 December 2011, we signed the partnership deed between Abhinav and i. This becomes the first case study under Ashoka Tree (blog/website under development, as of this date) – a dream project for me; worth consuming my life with.

I’ve helped Niswey win new business with some of Srijan’s clients; i’ll continue to mentor and advise, and even do sales and marketing for the company. I believe this is essential for the success of the business. My work experience apart from the business relationships and i have built over these years have tremendous value for any business i would be associated with. Niswey gets a distinct advantage of being called the sister concern of Srijan Technologies, thus leveraging that large potent network of clients and business.

Visual representation of words for conducting surveys

Kapil Sibal - DROWPS cloud

The genesis of this idea started in 2009, when at Srijan we wanted to design our Tees. We’ve never had any catch-line that we define ourselves with, as i never could do so. Only some “key words” described us best – Open Source, Open Culture, Transparency, Democratic, and so on. During a survey among the 20 of s at Srijan then, some 25-30 keywords came up. It was obvious that a visual tag-cloud representation would really help us describe ourselves democratically very well. And it would give us our top-10 keywords for printing at the back of our official tees.

This resulted in a very simple Drupal installation, which we handed over to an intern as his internal training project. He could not complete it then. But took it back with him to his college, and to my surprise had kept working on it in his part-time. He joined back Srijan, post completion of his studies, and we’ve kept working on it at a “snail’s pace” – he’s done all the programming in his private time at home, as our “bread and butter” needs of serving our clients take over at office.

So, we have our first product now. Arijit Dutta is the developer, and the co-founder of hopefully a great product company in the future.

Recently, we’ve been demoing the product to several people who believe can influence its course, and help us take the product to market. Through these demos we’ve come across some TED Talks where a similar tool has been used. Also, serendipitously, there are some more places we’ve come across a similar use of such “visual representation of keywords“. See below for some screenshots of a similar use of the words cloud.

jonathan_harris_we_feel_fine_project

Jonathan Harris presented this in his TED Talk around "We Feel Fine project" http://www.ted.com/talks/jonathan_harris_tells_the_web_s_secret_stories.html

drowps_dries_drupalcon_describe_drupal

Describe Drupal in one-word - Dries Buytaert, the creator of Drupal, and CTO of Acquia, presented this State of Drupal survey results in the same tag cloud concept.

drowps_dries_drupalcon_who_took_the_survey

Dries also used the same concept to demonstrate "who took" the State of Drupal survey.

The application of such a product in “receiving feedback” on yourself, on your company, on your role in the company, is immense. Besides it is anonymous, and hence people can offer it freely.

 

Where do you want to go Rahul?

Recently, at a customer visit i was asked where i wanted Srijan to be in 5 years form now. This is a nightmare of a question for me. And i respond in several ways depending upon how and who asks it.

I don’t know

Perhaps too impressed – right or wrong – by Ricardo Semler, i’ve nearly always not liked the idea of putting numbers to define where i’d like to be. $1 million or $10 million are not numbers that come intuitively to my mind either. Apart from the zeros in them, i cannot visualize what that would mean in terms of the building, the people working there, the location, the environment, the happiness index – for myself and the people working there, etc. Numbers say nothing about all these ideas (and ideals?) i get inspired by and seek in the enterprise i associate myself with or like to build.

Large buildings and campuses that a company owns, accumulation of property, a 1000 people working – these sort of visions may evoke my envy surely, but barely inspire me for sustained durations.

I get inspired when something i did, touched and changed someone’s life. Like this girl at my office from Srinagar. During an offsite to a camp by www.exper.in, she revealed how during a meeting at office my acknowledgement of her thoughts/approach had touched her life in a deeply profound way. “For 22 years i have not spoken”, she told the group at the camp. “This was the first time i felt even i had something valuable to say”, she continued. It seems she called her mother after the meeting and told her that she had “found a voice” and that she was being heard. I had tears in my eyes when i heard this. I suddenly felt a sense of achievement and reward for my years of toil and struggle at Srijan. This is not the only incident. There have been many more, although with a less dramatic effect on me. Several people who i have been able to touch in a profound and deep way. And perhaps continue to through the medium of my day-to-day work, sharing, writing and one-on-one interactions in different settings. It seems, in their self-expression, i find mine.

Now this is a problem as well. It seems my personality type, is best suited for being a teacher, counsellor, coach, actor, artist, and so on. Yes, Entrepreneur finds its way in the list as well.

But i struggle with doing things like “project reviews“, “keeping a strong focus on money and profitability“, “building a strong vision for the company” and other hard things that CEOs must do as part of their jobs. This is the reason i’ve felt that i need a good CEO. But at the same time, i feel by seeking someone out like that, i am abdicating my responsibilities of leading people to the vision i have.

And i nearly killed Srijan with this

My style has always been to identify some good people – get them together, take care of their needs in life, and tell them – “Here you go… here is a set of goals we need to achieve, for all of us collectively to find money and live happily together; let’s find what in this we can do best and do it”. Also, “…and we’ll share what profits we make in an equitable manner”. But doing this, has burnt me. It burnt me and Srijan really badly during the 2009-2010 period. I hired about 4-5 really senior people (10-15 years exp in technology and marketing) within a span of 6 months or so (we were flooded with projects!), and shared all the sort of problems we had at Srijan, and asked them to help solve them.

In a few months of disillusioned working, one of the person who i parted ways on a rather unhappy note (yet i still respect) came to me and told me, “Rahul, we need leadership at Srijan. I don’t think getting a bunch of good senior people is going to magically solve your problems.” This was the truth. But i could not understand why all these senior people – and that too really motivated ones, who were all there at Srijan because they were all entrepreneurs at heart, had their financial needs taken care of – could not work together and separate jobs/roles/tasks between themselves and take Srijan to greater heights. This was a democratic setup, where they could argue with each other, and take on roles voluntarily, and by demonstrating to each other what they could do best.

On the contrary, there were constant ego-clashes, blame on me, blame the poor infrastructure we could manage given the breakdown of Delhi during Commonwealth Games. And projects – oh they were failing all over the place. I must acknowledge i had had my share of failings. Things i could have done a bit better. But only a bit, i feel. I have reasons to believe this, given that we’re doing so much better now, with similar interventions with a different set of people that i made.

Yet, nearly all these senior and great people we got on board during that one year, have been highly competent and skilled people, even quite evolved, if i may say, and yet it led to the near-collapse of Srijan. I continue to respect most of these people, be in touch, and even pass them business and references in areas where Srijan does not work any longer (nearly all of them have started their own enterprises; and Srijan decided to focus on Drupal only post the merger; and get out of Django, TYPO3 and some other technology spaces).

I can do some things well. And i just cannot manage some other things at all. Is it worth for me to learn all these skills. Perhaps, they are, if i were to fill the shoes of a CEO of a solid and profitable technology company. But this does not interest me, honestly. I do not run away from the “mundane” day-to-day routine tasks. That is not the point. Just that some things i feel, i have no natural caliber for. And no matter how much my friend and mentor Rajneesh Rastogi, points these out to me as must-dos to be an effective CEO at Srijan, i’m unable to bring constancy to these must-dos.

Perhaps, i am undisciplined. Huh, i just don’t know. :(

Chief Potter

On the other hand, i started to call myself “Chief Potter” a year back. To me this role is about someone, who is creating, giving shape, to something beautiful – a new creation; an inspired piece of work. And how would i do this? By – once again – getting together some good people, and giving them space to find their self-expression and learning, and piggy backing on them to find my self-expression, growth, and financial goals.

Actually, I am deeply compassionate at heart, and am in a hurry to solve the larger problems we face as a country and a global society. Mass scale Water Harvesting, Solar Energy investments, Waste to Energy, large scale Biochar production and adoption in villages, are areas that have inspired me for as long as i can remember.

Infact, when i started out on my own way back in 1999-2002, IT was to be a stepping stone for me to make money so that i could get into politics (and never bend an inch from my high principles for need of money) and solve the major socio-economic problems of this country and my people.

One thing i am clear about is that i know and realise my limited potential to dream big for an IT company. This is not to say, that i do not get inspired by what i am doing in IT. Yes, certainly i do. I get inspired by the vision of creating a “Small Giant“. I get inspired by companies like Semco which Ricardo Semler has modelled on principles of self-organisation. And by the work culture of ThoughtWorks.

I get inspired by, and relate to such statements:

“I don’t want to know where Semco is headed. It doesn’t unnerve me to see nothing on the company’s horizon. I want Semco and its employees to ramble through their days, to use instinct, opportunity, and ingenuity to choose projects and ventures.” ~ Ricardo Semler; CEO, Semco

The underlying principle in all these is the “principle of people” – their aspirations, their self-expression, the direction they collectively wish to give, a larger aligning of common goals of all individuals. Collective Leadership or even Leaderless-ness. The latter is a term i heard for the iconic music band “Indian Ocean”. After 20 years of 4 guys playing together, and one guy being the key motivator in keeping the band together in its early volatile years, none of them has any leadership role in the band. They share credit equally. Anyone can play anything, other than their designated instruments. Anyone can take lead while composing music (the rest allow this almost intuitively). They choose compositions for pursuing if “collective energy happens”, as they say. Deeply, deeply inspiring! And motivating!

Dharamshala

Recently, Srijan Dharamshala happened. One of my friends, who i have come to trust deeply over the last 4-5 years – and has oriented all of his career to bring socio-economic change to Himachal Pradesh – has been pursuing me to setup Srijan in that region. I’ve always pushed him off, even though this is something i would have loved to do – have small companies in different parts of the country, amidst different cultures. This is a dream i have nurtured for many years, and even had a failed attempt at starting out in Srinagar, J&K. He came across this guy with 22 years in the software industry; a veteran who had sold his shares in a company that was being bought, made some money, reduced his needs to bare minimum, and moved to Dharamshala a year back – to be next to his first love – the mountains.

After carefully, slowly, and even skeptically, moving forward, i have come to trust him and his abilities deeply. The one big factor common in all of these Dharamshala folks is the pursuit of goals which are non-monetary and emanate from a state of an inspired mind. These people can live pretty frugally, are very down to earth and i feel, also have faith in people intuitively – qualities that i feel pride in myself for possessing and living by. This made working and negotiating with them a comfortable process.

So we have a Srijan Dharamshala happening. And with it a dream of Srijan fulfilling.

What is easy in this process is that, it is the head of this setup, who calls building a large IT company, “an unfinished business” for him. He brings on the values and the organisational work culture, which are not much different than mine. Additionally, and perhaps more importantly, he has clear ideas about how software needs to be written, and is a trained Quality professional.

All this makes my job rather easy – and something i can do well. Market! Market him, the team, the values and culture through writing and all through the social and digitally connected world that we live in. Using the Srijan brand built over years of toil and hard work, to bring in business, makes this a much attainable and likable task for me.

Aligning goals of the individual with the goals of the collective

The vision is someone else’s, the support of that vision is mine. And in all of the models that i have laid out above – Semco, Indian Ocean, ThoughtWorks – are driven by aligning the goals of the individual with the goals of the “collective”.

So this really seems to be my calling. And i would not care if i were doing technology business, or setting up Solar plants, or building a responsible rural tourism company (something else that so, so, damn motivates me).

Reality of paying bills

However, amidst all this idealism financial constraints take over. The home has to run and bills paid. Over the last years at Srijan, i’ve not saved anything, other than funding 40% of the house to own it (rest my father paid). My wife earns more than me – and while this is not a problem at all to me (i’m actually proud of this, and like to state this to sexist/chauvisnistic male discourse in my extended family to shock them out of their wits), it is clear that i have to depend upon her to dig into her reserves in case of a family emergency – which so far by God’s Grace has not happened. I would also like to pay back my parents and atleast contribute to their finances. I continue to do such things in small ways, and get more appreciation than i deserve, yet i’d like to do “atleast enough”. What i do to payback is so small and insignificant, and often erratic, that it is clearly not satisfying.

Clearly, Srijan has not done well, and the road in the larger roadmap – to my own mind – is unclear. We are clear about being recognized as the #1 Drupal company in India by end of 2011. We have metrics to measure ourselves for being #1.

Acquisition?

Acquisition of Srijan is an option we have toyed with, and stated and shared with our people. Recently, we’ve got an offer. The person is a “financial buyer” (a term i recently learnt) and has bought a competitor, and would liked to buy us to consolidate his growth story to his shareholders at the BSE. I think that they payout to us would be really scarce because of the poor past finances. Besides, this is really not the kind of investment we require. We need a “strategic investor” who can help us solve our day-to-day problems of finding the next business. We’re competent of delivering really large scale projects in Drupal. We’re a set of highly motivated and talented and self-expressed people. We need good sales – while not lowering our brand value and dignity to “cheap Indian code-writing mercenaries”. We’re underdogs, but we try that much harder. Yes, often i have felt that the current societal environment does not value these.

What feels scary in an acquisition is that all the values that i have lived for and cultivated in people at Srijan – our own ethos – which is often difficult to state in words – but is “felt” constantly by most of us, may get thrown out of the window. The culture and leadership that we admire comes out from a very few companies in India – ThoughtWorks (Pune to be particular), and perhaps MindTree (primarily because of what Subroto Bagchi shares through his talks and writings). Infosys, yes sounds really nice, but is too far in the horizon for me to be able to form a judgement about – like some version of god who is not an equal to you. Being a ThoughtWorks or a MindTree (once again i feel from the brief interactions with its people, and through the writings of Subroto Bagchi) are honestly within our reach. I feel we can be like them; they are inspiring because they have managed growth without losing their soul. ThoughtWorks actually retains and cultivates the soul like i have not experienced. It is an ideal anyone our size and ideals, would like to emulate. And be acquired by. :)

Acquisition by US companies like Acquia, and some others would be really useful. Some of these companies are iconic in their brand positioning in the open source/Drupal community. This is a huge win for all the people working at Srijan, and a goal achieved for me, even if the values and core have to be re-aligned to their goals and values. For one, people working at most American Drupal companies are fiercely expressive, vocal and have their own huge brand value in the community. Often people in such companies are bigger than the company; but the company gives these people a platform for self-expression and the pursuit of excellence. Secondly, given our excellent experience delivering projects to one another such US company, we feel we can huge win for a US company, and shoot up their profits exponentially. This would be a goal worth pursuing.

Can i not create such iconic companies?

Can i? Can we? Like remain so focussed that we create a ThoughtWorks or a MindTree or an Acquia? Can we create a “Small Giant” instead – remain small yet iconic – like www.developmentseed.com – a company i, and so many of us at Srijan admire so so deeply?

In doing this, my own skills are a hinderance. Also, i’ve been badgered so much all these 10-12 years (bringing Srijan to wherever it is now has been surely tough), that i am scared of pushing for this only by myself and my ideas; finances are a concern as i have entered the latter half of my 30s (and the 40 is just a few years away). My risk taking ability is taking a beating. And i am NOT happy about this at all.

I am a person who loves to find new zones of discomfort. Infact, i really desire to go out start a rural tourism company. I just need the running expenses of my home taken care of, and some reserve to fall back on in case there is an emergency. Even the iconic Maharana Pratap struck a compromise with Akbar after his years of battle and sacrifice, when he saw his sons eating rotis cooked with grass (during his years in hiding in the forest and carrying out attacks on the Mughals from there). I know we will not come to this. I will find a boring day job, which will kill me slowly over the years, but i will ensure security for my family.

Yet, i would hate to see this life be wasted away with mundane living. It would be a loss for this “yearning soul” of mine, and for this world.

Riding on the back of other people’s ambition

This is the reason when our partner in Dharamshala unit/company says that “i will never sell“, and “i will make a big company“, it is such a relief. It is a relief because our values are so closely aligned, and he has stated his vision. I know he has skills to create a sound software engineering team, that this makes his vision viable and achievable. I have to do what i do best from the outside to ensure that i help him achieve his ambition.

So perhaps, just as for Dharamshala, for Delhi and for any future ventures such as Srinagar (which i am so determined to do) or Bangkok (we’re in early discussions with folks there to setup a Drupal JV) and our to-be-office in the US, the future is to align with more and more individuals who are determined to lead Srijan (as an over-arching brand) into a vision that they are motivated by.

This then must ensure independence of each of these units in choosing a course of direction for themselves. The Srijan brand does bring a lot of value of years of credibility (and yes, sadly and honestly, quite a few failed/challenged projects!), successful projects portfolio, mindspace, client references, developer community reach, industry reach, collective network of its various partners, etc.

Conclusions

I began writing this to clarify my own thoughts more than for addressing this to my readers. The trouble for Delhi is that both me and partner are both unclear and are probably looking at each other in defining the vision for Srijan Delhi.

The options are clear. Acquisition (or mergers) by a “strategic partner” for Delhi. And continue to ride on other peoples’ vision of what they wish to achieve and support them. In the process increase and stabilize my financial sources of income, my self-expression, other than helping them achieve theirs.

It is the modalities of equity ownership to keep things non-interfering whichever direction any of the units/companies takes – which is a bit difficult. But i am sure with some good financial advise and a CFO coming on board this can be solved – and i am meeting one such potential candidate today.

Let’s see where this goes.

Is an alternate business model possible?

These days, i’m exploring designing a corporate model based on principles of ‘equity’ and ‘equal opportunity’. I’ve been on this journey for some years now, and experimenting along the way on some of these principles at Srijan – with mixed results and half-success. However, the reasons for not achieving desired results, in no way, diminish the upside for having a corporate structure on the lines below.

Most of the of the observations here are a result of my first hand involvement (as employer) in two small businesses, my work (in employee capacity) 2 small-medium sized companies, and my years of reading and being coached by mentors and management thinkers, and the several books i’ve read on these issues.

Motivation/Reasons/Inspiration

Traditional Corporate model

  1. Businesses work hard for “increasing shareholder value” quarter after quarter with little care (perhaps face-value) for the environment and community they work in
  2. Shareholders are initial investors, who mostly have little/no contribution in running the day-to-day business, yet it is for them that all the mess in the corporate world exists – greed arising from measurements of company’s success based on profit increases quarter-on-quarter; else CEOs are booted out, and so on.
  3. Who are the shareholders? Mostly large investment firms who pay obscene amounts of money to their employees who risk people’s (tax payers’) money for increasing the wealth of the already wealthy
  4. A business’ goal is to increase its share-value – for an investment they made years ago, most-often through wealth that they did not create themselves (but perhaps inherited)
  5. Capitalism was invented to distribute wealth; and make it accessible to whoever was willing to take risk, and put in effort
  6. Now, effort/work/skills is de-linked from wealth-creation; worse there is often not even an equal opportunity for wealth creation by those who do not have much access

Stress between Employees and Employers

  1. Equity and ownership for employees is mostly left to offering ESOPs, which are also unpopular these days, specifically in India – where the laws are just-not as evolved as they are in the US
  2. Every business wants its employees to offer their 100% to the growth of the business
  3. While the enjoyment of the results of growth mostly lie with the promoters.
  4. Most often the promoters work the hardest – especially in small businesses – while employees can often take things as “another job”
  5. Those employees who take 100% ownership and responsibility and far few; and while they do tend to get rewarded, most often the rewards are not commensurate to their efforts
  6. Attitudes at both ends are problematic, dissatisfying and lead to slow-down in the pace of growth of a business
  7. For an employer/promoter it causes stress and a work-life imbalance, and most often dysfunctional lives in spite of the wealth created
  8. If everyone shared “equal responsibility” (in their own respective roles and functions), and rewards for such equal-ness could also be proportionately distributed, the complete dynamics of the running of a business could change
  9. A key principle in this whole equation is “transparency” (in finances and information access) and “fair yet strong methods of measuring accountability”

Resulting problems in society

  1. The larger impact of such concentration of wealth with a few, creates complete disparity in society and results in the ever-widening gap between the “haves” and “have-nots”.
  2. The haves, further lobby and push government policy through often corrupt means to further maximise their opportunities for creation of wealth.
  3. Equal opportunities cease to exist; human self-expression and innate creativity (and meaning of life) takes a big hit, and eventually causes our social pathologies of rage, murder, rape, wars, and so on
  4. What we see in the Middle-East is at its core, just this inequality (in opportunity) erupting.

Successful business models that inspire

There are actually quite a few companies around the world who have created successful companies while make such partner models or even simply democratic models. Some examples:

  1. John Abraham has created a successful co-operative with his construction company in the USA
  2. Ricardo Semler has created deeply democratic structures at Semco in Brazil

An alternate business model

Learning from the Big 4

  1. It is possible to have an alternate model by copying the core ideas from the the biggest wealth-creation accounting and consulting firms such as KPMG, Deloitte, E&Y, PWC (Big Four), Accenture, others
  2. They have a model of “Partners”
  3. KPMG example:
    1. KPMG is registered as a co-operative in Switzerland
    2. All its country-specific arms are registered under laws of their respective countries mostly as Companies; KPMG India is a Pvt Ltd
    3. KPMG India has some few (perhaps less than 10) Senior Partners who are partners in the Swiss Co-operative
    4. Then there are Senior Partners in every practice, and region within India
    5. There are Junior Partners in every practice, and region within India
    6. Then there are employees
    7. The key difference between an “employee” and a “partner” is the amount of bonus a partner can make over an employee.
    8. As an example, an employee could only make 20% of bonuses, if the company did well, of their annual salary; however a junior partner could potentially make upto 80% (these are just example figures)
    9. Most partners, in spite of being partners, have really no say in any policy making or larger decisions covering the direction of the company – such as direction, M&A, or even how much profit sharing should be distributed.
    10. Financial information is not transparent and remunerations are likely to be extremely disparate
    11. Equal opportunities do not exist – because of the “political nature” (non-democratic) of their functioning

Fairness between Employees and Owners

  1. If a similar partner-model could be extended to creating all businesses, it seems, we could create a win-win between Employers and Employees certainly; and as a result of this a win-win-win between the Business, its Customers, and even the larger society it operates in.
  2. The legal structure in India now offers an LLP – a “limited liability partnership”, which allows promoters/partners to limit their liability in case of the failure of the company, while enjoying the ease of business of a partnership – which can be determined by the Shareholders agreement – which can be made just as they like – without any governance regulation imposed under the companies law. [This is to be verified].

Money, Mission and Passion!

Just spoke to an entrepreneur in Shimla, a Chemical Engineer named Vivek, who moved back to Himachal, his home state, to pursue these three goals – together!

“The important thing”, he says, “is to combine all of these”. “Many people combine, ‘mission and passion‘ or any other combination of these 3, but few can pursue all three together”, says Vivek.

“Mission” is that which is required to be done in society; “Passion” is your own self-expression or your inner-calling; while “Money” – ahem! most of us spend lifetimes following that trail. Vivek goes onto say that farmers in Himachal have depended upon government for far too long to bring benefits of technology to them to uplift their lives economically. “It is now time for the private sector to take charge”, he proclaims.

Vivek defined the Money-Mission-Passion paradigm very eloquently – bringing much needed clarity to my mind, aiding me in my articulation of my own social entrepreneurship dreams. Super!

Looking forward to meeting him in the coming week in Shimla!